(Medicare for all seems to me a bad idea, as with any federal attempt to do what states, families, or private orgs should do. Here is why (personal exp.)
I HAVE HAD NO CHOICE, nor has anyone I know, as to whether to *pay* into the Social Security and Medicare systems.
In contrast, I have had *choices* (freedom) about whether and how to sign up for private insurance etc.
And when I call *them*, typically in 10 minutes my question is answered helpfully, done.
I realize that is not true for everyone in every situation with private insurance.
But if this were left to the states (or individuals, families, communities) or private insurance, at least we would have a chance to have a choice with our $!
I have studied and experienced much, and traveled, as have many other people I know. Socialism, or federal "care" w/o choice, is not a good thing for society.
But, it has the effect of reducing freedom, giving smaller groups or individuals far too much control over larger groups of individuals.
Federal government "care" stifles, and harms, more than it helps, overall. Locally, we can do a better job with the $, if we could keep the money for that.
Letting states or local others address local problems helps to not make the federal budget problems even worse while trying to solve our *personal* problems.
If there are issues to solve, causes to carry, do those privately, or at the state/community/family/individual level, *outside* the Federal government.
The states, laboratories of democracy, are places where we can learn from each other what works best, and even move to a different set of laws sometimes.
Copyright (c) 2015-2024 Luke A. Call | Home | Feedback (won't put you on a mailing list): contact@lukecall.net (Content generated selectively from a OneModel instance. | Last updated: 2024-01-03.)